Choosing a destination in a time of terrorism
Note: I wrote this a couple of years ago, but the argument I make here still applies. Where I mention a terrorist attack from some time ago, just fill in whatever the most recent one was.
The attack on a Berlin Christmas market last week got me thinking about how terrorism affects travel and tourism.
Often, after an act of terrorism, the tourism industry in that location collapses. In the days and weeks following the attack, trips get cancelled. Sometimes individuals cancel out of fear. Sometimes airlines cancel, out of security concerns.
I suspect that Christmas markets all over Germany saw a drop in attendance in the last few days before Christmas. Some visitors, spooked by the attack, might cancel trips to Berlin altogether. On the scale of Germany’s tourism industry, it’ll only be a very small dip, I expect.
Terrorism in Egypt
Egypt, on the other hand, is a good example of a tourist industry taking a much bigger hit. It has a history of terrorist attacks over the last twenty years or so. Each one leads to a dive in tourist numbers, followed by a very gradual increase, until the next attack.
The attack in October 2015, when a Russian plane full of tourists was shot down over the Sinai, led to the usual flurry of cancellations. Many airlines cancelled flights into or out of Sharm el-Sheikh, citing concerns about security there. Eventually, with assurances that the gaps in security had been repaired, many took up those flights again.
The most recent, as I revise this article, was in Giza in December 2018, when a tourist bus was the target. This is specifically intended to stop tourists from coming.
The tourist industry along the Red Sea, however, was much slower to recover. Hotels suffered in Sharm el-Sheikh especially, and some closed entirely, unable to survive the tourist drought. Many travelers still avoid Egypt, out of fear.
Because Egypt has experienced terrorist attacks in the past, tourists are much quicker to make that decision to stay away, and Egypt recovers more slowly than Germany (or Paris or Belgium, after their terrorist attacks).
It seems to me, though, that rather than avoiding a place where a terrorist attack has happened, we should do just the opposite: choose that location for our next vacation.
Why? You can look at this from two points of view: the political and the practical.
Political reasons to visit a past terrorism location
The intention of terrorism is expressed in its name: to terrorize people. By carrying out a large-scale attack, the terrorist wants to scare a nation into changing its ways.
If we change what we do, including travel, we are doing exactly what the terrorists want. We are helping the terrorists to undermine a country’s economy. By undermining the economy, we help undermine the government. A weak government can be replaced more easily by a different government that is more agreeable to the terrorists’ aims.
Instead, we should resist the urge to cancel travel plans. I’d go further and say to those who are still in the planning stages that you should intentionally choose places where recent attacks have occurred. Go to Berlin, or Paris, or Brussels. Go to Egypt, or Israel, or Morocco.
More specifically, I recommend booking your travel and tours with local companies, not the big chains. The local tourism-related companies suffer the most when the industry takes a dive. The big international hotel chains, for example, might lose some money when bookings drop, but they have enough other hotels to cushion the blow. The owner of a single hotel might lose it all, and so would the hotel’s employees.
Booking travel to a recently-hit location sends a message to terrorists and those who support them. It says “You cannot change my plans. You won’t damage the economy of the country I am visiting because I’m still going to visit. You can’t scare me.”
Here are some related articles about choosing a destination:
- Where should I travel? How to choose a destination
- Trip of a lifetime: Bloggers pick their must-see destinations
Practical reasons to visit a past target of terrorism
Once you put aside the generalized fear that many of us feel when visiting a past terrorist target, such a place can offer some real advantages on a personal level. These are, essentially, the selfish reasons to visit such a place.
1. The cost of changing your plans
If you’ve already booked a trip, canceling can be expensive. Your cancellation insurance might cover some of the cost, but will it also cover planning a whole new trip at last-minute prices? If you don’t have cancellation insurance, or if the insurance company doesn’t see fear as a valid reason to cancel, you’ll be out of luck and out of money.
If you haven’t yet booked your vacation and flights are still operating to the location where the terrorist attack happened, the airlines are likely to have a lot of empty seats on those flights. While booking flights last minute is usually very expensive, this might be the moment to get a seat at a reasonable price.
2. Having a place to yourself
Once you’re in that location, you may very well have far fewer crowds than normal. This is bad for local business owners, but pleasant for you.
At the same time, you’re likely to have the best security measures in place, since vigilance goes up so much after an attack.
When we visited Egypt’s Red Sea coast a few weeks after a terrorist attack on a hotel at Taba in 2004, the area was struggling to save its tourist industry. Traveling with two small children, we spent a lovely week at a small family-owned hotel on the beach.
The hotel had about 20 rooms, but for most of the week we were the only visitors. That meant we had all the peace and quiet we wanted. The service was excellent everywhere we ate, and we had the beach more or less to ourselves. Spending our money there helped local businesses, and we had a vacation we remember fondly to this day.
A more extreme example was our visit to Israel in the summer of 2014. This was when Israel and the Palestinians in Gaza were busy lobbing rockets at each other. We had planned to attend a cousin’s bar mitzvah and decided not to cancel the trip, since most of the fighting was confined to Gaza and a small area of Israel where we had no intention of going. Because of the limited range of the rockets on both sides, flights operated as usual too.
I have never seen the Old City of Jerusalem so empty. Normally the streets of the Old City are packed with locals and tourists, and sightseeing involves shuffling along extremely narrow streets, weaving through the crowds. Now the shops were open as always, but we were practically alone, outside of a few Christian visitors following the Stations of the Cross along the Via Dolorosa.
Not a war zone
I’m not recommending that you travel in places that are in the midst of war. Despite the fact that Palmyra sounds fascinating, now is not the time to visit Syria. But a terrorist target is not the same as a war zone.
I am recommending that you avoid thinking the way that terrorists want you to think. Fear is natural after an attack. But fear isn’t necessarily rational. Thinking rationally, weighing up the risks and benefits, might lead you toward the terrorists’ target, rather than away.
If it eases your mind, stay away from crowded places like markets or sporting events. The chances, though, of you being involved in an attack are very small. Driving to the airport is probably riskier. And recent history has shown that you also might want to avoid crowded places in your own hometown.
Terrorism is meant, partly, to stop you from visiting. Don’t let the terrorists get their way.
Have you ever visited a place that’s been a target of terrorism? How was your experience there? Please tell us about it in the comments below.
Really insightful and thought provoking post Rachel. Not sure I necessarily agree with you re: visiting there anyway, but I do agree with always booking local and not necessarily going with the big chains. Support local tourism.
Thanks for your comment. It’s everybody’s individual decision, of course. I just think we shouldn’t dismiss places as easily as we do.
I returned from visiting Germany’s Christmas Markets shortly before the attack in Berlin. While it certainly made me count my blessings, I’m with you and will continue to travel the world. My eyes and thought process will be more aware, but there is no way I’ll allow terrorists to have that control. We must choose every day what we will be afraid of, I choose to try and understand different cultures, not fear them.
Exactly! If we let the terrorists determine what we do, we’re giving in.
I guess I have similar feelings on many of your comments. I did not cancel my trip to Paris 2 months after the November attacks and continue to return. While I would not necessarily choose, say, Syria, as a destination, I don’t entirely shy away from places because of recent events….but I am cautious.
Well, you have to be cautious in general anyway: pickpockets, etc. can ruin a holiday pretty much anywhere! Interestingly, I’ve heard people here in Holland say they won’t go to the US because there are so many guns and so much gun violence. Yet many Americans get scared off of visiting places like Paris and Brussels!
Agree 100% with this. Your point about the local providers is perfect. It’s a small way we can help by continuing to bring business to them.
Thanks for this thoughtful post. Terrorism achieves its goals by its randomness—thus, making it pretty impossible to predict where it will occur next.
I had a bizarre experience in 2014 A month after we left, the place was rocked by another terrorist blast.I booked a nonrefundable flight to Tunisia, only to find out later that it had been rocked by a terrorist attack. My friend and I decided to go anyway, booked at a suburb b&b and hired a private driver. The whole place seemed to be practically to ourselves!
A month after you left where?
Agree. Tho it’s natural to feel fearful, for me it’s important to refrain from making decisions based on those feelings of fear or I’ve given in and they’ve achieved their goal.
Of course you should weigh up the risks and advantages, but the decision should be rational, not emotional. Too many people, for example, will cross the entire Middle East off their travel list when something happens anywhere in the Middle East.
I totally agree with you in theory, yet I still find myself hesitating to book a trip to Egypt and Jordan. Part of that is my husband’s reluctance, but I’m not sure that is all. I even have a friend in Egypt who is an amazing guide. . .
I’ve traveled in Egypt several times, and found it absolutely fascinating each time. But I understand your hesitation. Just last week, the US issued a stronger travel advisory about Jordan. “The U.S. Department of State warns U.S. citizens of threats from terrorist groups throughout Jordan and to consider the risks of travel to and throughout the country.” And it goes on to specify where it’s not safe to be and what attacks have happened there. It certainly makes me reconsider my plans to visit Jordan in late March. But I want to make a rational decision, so I’ll wait till nearer the time and watch carefully to see if things have settled down or gotten worse. I won’t just reject it out of hand.
I totally agree, of course, war zones are off limits but terrorist attacks can happen anywhere so people should go on with their plans.
Tough topic. Impossible to be completely immune from trouble, whether at home or when traveling. I would think that traveling more authentically, using local providers and lodging, would reduce your profile. Good thing!
Yes, I should have written that too. Terrorists target crowded, high-profile places. Good point.
Bravo, Rachel! I couldn’t have said it better myself. Think I’ll share this post with a dear friend who is sure my husband and I will never come back from our trip to Jordan and Israel in March. I was born in Israel, and still have family there. It’ll be a cold day in hell before I’ll allow a bunch of murderous thugs to keep me away. My mother did just that, and never saw her two younger sisters before they died. Hope to see you in Jerusalem for TBEX.
I have family there too, so yes, I’ll be there! I’m probably going to do Jordan too, after TBEX.
That’s great. Maybe our paths will cross again in Jerusalem.
I hope so!
Rachel, I totally get your point about visiting locations that have been hit by terrorism. I visited Egypt the year the Iraq – US year broke out. Half of the group canceled plans even though the other 3/4 parts of the trip was going to take place in Europe. We ended up having an excellent time (and it was the cheapest and the most delicious location).
The other thing is that people do not want to visit places notorious by terrorism but they end up visiting places that are not that safe but marketing agencies make them look like paradise. They criticize people who go to “dangerous” places but do not realize they are exposing themselves in some way too.
We usually don’t alter our plans because of terrorism; however, we’ve never sought out a terrorized place to visit either. We visited Washington, D.C. a few weeks after the Brussels bombing, and I think Washington had been mentioned as a possible target. A late night fire alarm caused us to evacuate the hotel, and I’ll admit that we wondered if it was just an means to get us targets conveniently clustered on the sidewalk for an attack. We ended up wandering the cold, dark streets with the kids in their pajamas just to make sure we were out of the area. Of course, it turned out okay, but we felt that it was a precaution we needed to take.
That would never have occurred to me! I mean, wouldn’t it be more effective for a terrorist to blow up the building with everyone in it rather than getting them outside first?
The times we’ve been to such places — Egypt after an attack and Israel during the conflict with Gaza two summers ago — we had already booked our trips. What we did differently was consciously decide to go anyway, after studying the situation carefully. In the case of Egypt, we weren’t going anywhere near where the attack had taken place, and we felt like we couldn’t write off a whole country because of it. That’s just what terrorists want! As for Israel, the Gaza bombs didn’t reach very far into Israel, and we just wouldn’t go too near. Our relatives live there all year; the least we could do was show up when we said we’d show up!